Everything is a Freaking DNS problem - opensuse http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/taxonomy/term/621/0 en yum install mariadb http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/yum-install-mariadb <p>I`m not the biggest fan of openSUSE but this weeks <a href="http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2010/07/17/opensuse-users-have-a-choice-of-database-now?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ColinCharles+%28colin+charles+blog%29" rel="nofollow">post by Colin Charles</a> makes me happy ..</p> <p>openSUSE users can now do a mariadb install from their default repositories.</p> <p>With all the fuzz about Snoracle and MySQL's future last year to me it became clear that we would end up having different MySQL based distributions, probably with different names, and that it would be up to the Linux distributions to provide the users with what they preferred, working with those Linux distributions<br /> therefore would be very important for the MySQL distributions.</p> <p>Sadly my Fedora box doesn't allow me to do a yum install mariadb yet ... but I`m sure that's only a matter of time ..</p> http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/yum-install-mariadb#comments distributions fedora mariadb mysql opensuse snoracle Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:55:23 +0000 Kris Buytaert 1014 at http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog SELinux is Dead ! http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/node/714 <p>No really it isn't but so isn't AppArmor, altough <a href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/08/23/apparmor-is-dead/">Russel</a> claims it is. Weird how he totally rewords the <a href="http://news.opensuse.org/2008/08/20/opensuse-to-add-selinux-basic-enablement-in-111/">OpenSuse statements</a></p> <p>From "While our customer experience shows that AppArmor is the best solution for the vast majority of users, applications, and use cases, we want to give all of our users the ability to choose the security framework that’s appropriate for their respective environments and needs. We continue to enable AppArmor as our default Host Intrusion Prevention System......"</p> <p>To "The next step will be to make SE Linux the default and AppArmor the one that exists in a repository, and the step after that will be to remove AppArmor."</p> <p>Given <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AppArmor">Ubuntu's AppArmor adoption</a> I don't see it die that fast ...</p> <p>The real problem is who uses AppArmor or SELinux, sadly most of the installations I run into have none of both technologies enabled. Most Admins overrule their favourite distro's default config. The reason is pretty obvious as <a href="http://www.krisbuytaert.be/blog/node/335">I've</a> heard <a href="http://www.sxw.org.uk/lighting/">a lot of</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELinux#Quotes">intelligent</a> <a href="http://thunk.org/tytso/">people</a> say "Life Is Too short For SELinux"</p> <p>So I wonder, how can you die if you never were really alive ?</p> http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/node/714#comments apparmor open source opensuse selinux ubuntu Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:05:55 +0000 Kris Buytaert 714 at http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog Why openSLES doesn't exist http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/node/501 <p>Over a year ago I asked <a href="http://www.krisbuytaert.be/blog/?q=node/210">Lazyweb</a>: <cite>I wonder why nobody tried to rebuild SLES like RHEL...</cite>Yesterday .. <a>Dag</a> responded. It indeed seems that the community around Fedora and CentOS is much bigger than the community around openSUSE<br /> The comment from Leo to his posting is confirming that. <a href="http://www.stroobant.be/" rel="nofollow">Luc </a> makes an observation regarding the use of any Suse based product .. namely that people who are using it are stripping Yast from it .. sounds like something I could have said :)</p> http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/node/501#comments centos closedsuse opensuse rhel sles Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:41:31 +0000 Kris Buytaert 501 at http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog